Reading KULR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track KULR free→Reading KULR? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track KULR free→
AMEXInformation TechnologyElectronic ComponentsSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality can't be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Compared with sector peers, KULR trades below typical levels. Peer multiples imply a price about 31% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis), and the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This is because it trades below peer multiples, but recent financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $4.04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $4.04, KULR's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 14× p/s (3.8× the 4× p/s peer median). At a normal multiple the price implies ~-5% near-term growth vs our ~72% forecast. That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $4.25 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 5% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 72%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.62x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$384.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$948.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $7,804.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
As of June 15, 2026, the valuation dimension changed and became inexpensive. Risk remained high, while the sector backdrop showed a tailwind. The recent financial performance was weak, and earnings quality was noted as loss-making. The management dimension was described as volatile.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Better margins mean lower costs and more profit. This can help investor trust.
Confirms:Gross profit margin goes above 30% in the next quarters.
Disproves:Gross profit margin drops or stays below 30%. This shows ongoing cost problems.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for KULR yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Chief Financial Officer — Dr. Michael Philip Kimel: Dr. Michael Philip Kimel resigned from the Board and certain committee positions to become Chief Financial Officer.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 22 of 100 | fair | high |
APH Amphenol | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | full | moderate |
GLW Corning Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 41 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
COHR Coherent Corp. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 33 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LFUS Littelfuse | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 99 of 100 | full | moderate |
20 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on generating an estimated $30 million in total revenue from a new agreement starting in 2026.
Focus on improving gross profit margin as part of operational efficiency.
Manage executive transitions effectively to maintain leadership stability.
Why it matters: New leaders can change company plans and results. Stability helps keep investor trust.
Confirms one read:Announcement of a new CFO with a strong track record in technology firms.
Confirms the other:More leaders leave or there is more instability in leadership.
Why it matters: Meeting the revenue goal shows KULR's growth strategy is working. It affects future funding and investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 revenue reported at or above $7.5M, indicating a strong path to the $30M goal.
Disproves:Q2 revenue falls below $7.5M, suggesting challenges in achieving the $30M target.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (b) & (e) On May 21, 2026, KULR Technology Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of KULR Technology Group, Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release (the “Agreement”) with Shawn Canter, pursuant to which Mr. Canter’s employment with KULR Technology Corporation will terminate. Accordingly, effective May 22, 2026,…
is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of such section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On April 28, 2026, the holder of a majority of the outstanding aggregate voting stock of KULR Technology Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “KULR”), acting by consent in lieu of a stockholder meeting under Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), voted to (i) remove Dr. Joanna Massey, Donna Grier, Aron Schwartz,…
is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of such section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.