Reading OUST? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track OUST free→Reading OUST? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track OUST free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologyElectronic ComponentsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and it has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is high, and compared with sector peers, it is below typical. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, which may support performance. Peer multiples imply a price about 13% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $42.73. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $43, OUST's earnings are too small for P/E to mean much; on sales it trades at 13× p/s (3.5× the 4× p/s peer median). That gap is an optionality premium a financial-multiple model can't price — our $49 fair value covers only the as-is business, low confidence. Analysts: $40–$75. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 13% below a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.76x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates.
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.11 → $-0.14 (-23.6% / 30d). 2 raised, 1 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 86% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 50.7% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$389.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$933.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,515.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'fair' to 'full'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth drops, it may impact Ouster's performance. It could signal a broader slowdown.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
LiDAR expansion aligns with revenue growth objectives.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$40.00 – $75.00 (median $53.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-05-29
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Components.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
OUST Ouster, Inc. | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 21 of 100 | full | high |
APH Amphenol | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 66 of 100 | full | moderate |
GLW Corning Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
COHR Coherent Corp. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
LFUS Littelfuse | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 98 of 100 | full | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Ouster expects to achieve $49.5 million to $52.5 million in total revenue for 2026-Q2.
Ouster announced the acquisition of Stereolabs SAS to enhance its product offerings.
Downgrade may impact investor sentiment and growth perception.
New product launch supports revenue growth strategy.
Other Events. On May 8, 2026, Ouster, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Northland Securities, Inc., Rosenblatt Securities Inc., and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (each, an “Agent” and, collectively the “Agents”), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time, through or to the Agents, acting as agents or principals, shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, having an aggregate of…
of this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Regulation FD Disclosure. The Company issued a press release on February 9, 2026, announcing that it closed the acquisition of Stereolabs SAS. The press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference. The information in Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1, of this Current Report on Form 8-K is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On December 17, 2025, Ouster, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into the fourth amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the NNN Lease Agreement with SIC-350 Treat, LLC, as amended, for its headquarters in San Francisco, California (the “NNN Lease”). The Fourth Amendment provides for, among other things, an extension of the term of the NNN Lease to August 31, 2034, and an initial decrease in the annual base rent to $50.00 per rental square foot, effective a…