Reading IT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track IT free→Reading IT? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track IT free→
NYSEInformation TechnologyInformation Technology ServicesSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, while earnings quality and management's recent track record are neutral. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, IT is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is fair, priced roughly in line with peer multiples. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and sector trends, particularly how bellwethers perform. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $142.73. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $143 IT trades at 11× p/e, in line with its 10× p/e peer median. Our $137 fair value reflects that, high confidence. Analysts: $140–$183. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 4% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 3%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated strong grew net income 73% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.85x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=2831).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $3.74 → $3.75 (+0.3% / 30d). 10 raised, 3 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 20% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 10.2% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$160.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$485.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,562.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Earnings results can show if the company is meeting growth expectations. This affects future guidance.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings were much better than expected. This shows strong performance.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings miss expectations, raising concerns about growth.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for IT yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
and in Exhibit 99.1 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such f…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$140.00 – $183.00 (median $163.00) · 8 analysts · as of 2026-06-12
Looks more expensive than peers.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus IT Consulting & Other Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
IT Gartner | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | full | elevated |
IBM IBM | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 35 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ACN Accenture | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 99 of 100 | full | elevated |
CTSH Cognizant | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | fair | elevated |
APLD APPLIED DIGITAL CORPORATION | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 20 of 100 | expensive | high |
12 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Gartner aims to increase its full-year free cash flow guidance.
Gartner continues to authorize share repurchases to enhance shareholder value.
Gartner anticipates an acceleration in Contract Value (CV) throughout 2026.
Why it matters: Negative revenue growth shows problems with demand or competition. This could hurt investor confidence.
Confirms:Q2 2026 revenue was below $1.5 billion. This shows negative growth from last year.
Disproves:Q2 2026 revenue exceeds $1.5 billion, showing positive growth year over year.
Why it matters: Details on share buybacks can signal confidence in the company's value. This may positively impact the stock price.
Confirms:Management talks about the share buyback program.
Disproves:No further details are given on the share repurchase program.
Why it matters: An increase in free cash flow guidance would suggest better cash management and financial health. This could attract investors.
Confirms:Management raises free cash flow guidance for 2026 in the next earnings call.
Disproves:Management maintains or lowers free cash flow guidance for 2026.
Why it matters: Accelerating contract value growth would indicate strong demand and successful sales strategies. This could boost stock sentiment.
Confirms:Contract value growth reported above 2% year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:Contract value growth reported below 1% year over year in Q2 2026.
REGULATION FD DISCLOSURES. Financial Results Gartner has scheduled a webcast call at 8:00 a.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, May 5, 2026 to discuss the Company’s financial results for the first quarter of 2026. An earnings supplement will also be available via the Internet by accessing the Company’s website at https://investor.gartner.com. An audio replay of the webcast will also be available on the Company's website. Share Repurchase Authorization On April 30, 2026, the Company’s Board of Directo…
and in Exhibit 99.1 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
REGULATION FD DISCLOSURES. Financial Results Gartner has scheduled a webcast call at 8:00 a.m. Eastern time on Tuesday, February 3, 2026 to discuss the Company’s financial results for the three months and year ended December 31, 2025. An earnings supplement will also be available via the Internet by accessing the Company’s website at https://investor.gartner.com. An audio replay of the webcast will also be available on the Company’s website. Share Repurchase Authorization On January 29, 2026,…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On January 29, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Gartner, Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Daniela Rus and Edward Bousa to the Board, effective immediately. With the additions of Professor Rus and Mr. Bousa, the Board expands to 13 directors, 12 of whom are independent. In connection with their appointments, the Board also appointed Profe…