GREENIDGE GENERATION HOLDINGS INC (GREE)
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-10-29
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put GREE beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisMiddle-of-the-pack management execution.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 3% on a typical day and fell roughly 54% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskGREE’s case rests on performance recovery, but its recent financial performance remains weak. The company has no recorded earnings release, so growth and its latest result cannot be assessed. GREE has no valuation multiple or peer comparison in the desk. Its recent performance sits below its industry cohort. The model puts next-quarter miss probability at 32%. GREE was unprofitable over the past year. Peer multiples imply no available valuation read; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-08-20. GREE is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 1 analyst currently covering GREE (as of Jul 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare GREE with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREE Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Investment Banking & Brokerage — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put GREE next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
Renaming and funding align with growth strategy in AI/HPC.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-08-20. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.