Reading DOMH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DOMH free→Reading DOMH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track DOMH free→
NASDAQFinancialsCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, and earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, but risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with DOMH trading below typical compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 82% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk, as it trades below peer multiples while recent financials are weak. Key factors to watch include guidance changes and the performance of sector bellwethers. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $3.26. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $3.26 DOMH trades at 1× p/s, below its 2× p/s peer median. Our $5.81 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 44% below a flat-multiple fair value; not enough history to forecast a comparison. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 59% for the rest of the cohort, n=3730).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.40x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
8 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 57% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=5004).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$272.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$903.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,949.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The FOMC decision can change interest rates. This also affects how much money is in the market. It impacts Dominari's work.
Confirms one read:FOMC raises interest rates. This may reduce liquidity in the market.
Confirms the other:FOMC keeps interest rates steady. This helps create a better liquidity environment.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for DOMH yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 22, 2026, Dominari Holdings Inc. (the “ Company ”), a Delaware corporation, in a successful effort to reduce market overhang from outstanding warrants, entered into inducement agreements (the “Inducement Agreements”) with certain holders (the “ Holders ”) of Series B warrants (the “ Series B Warrants ”) of the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of 3,133,880 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“ Common Stock…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2024-Q3, 2025-Q1, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
DOMH Dominari Holdings Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 20 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
MS Morgan Stanley | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 57 of 100 | full | moderate |
GS Goldman Sachs | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 45 of 100 | full | moderate |
SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | fair | moderate |
IBKR Interactive Brokers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 56 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
No qualifying priorities for this snapshot. Check back after the next refresh.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth would signal a slowdown in the financial sector. This could affect Dominari's performance.
Confirms:Revenue growth is below its median level. This shows a possible slowdown.
Disproves:Revenue growth is above its median level. This shows ongoing strength.
Why it matters: Retail sales data shows how people spend money. This affects Dominari's view of the market.
Confirms one read:Retail sales rise more than 0.5% month over month. This shows strong consumer demand.
Confirms the other:Retail sales decrease or grow less than 0.5% month over month, signaling weak consumer demand.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such information shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, rega…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers Employment Agreement Amendments On March 20, 2026, Dominari Holdings Inc. (the “ Company ”) entered into amendments (collectively, the “ Amendments ”) to the employment agreements by and between the Company and each of Anthony Hayes, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Kyle Wool, the Company’s President (collectively, the “ Employment Agreeme…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. CFO Appointment; Resignation of Tim Ledwick as a Director Effective as of October 1, 2025, Tim Ledwick, 67, was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer of Dominari Holdings Inc. (the “Company”). Mr. Ledwick served as the Audit Committee Chair of the Company since 2015. Most recently, he provided CFO consulting services to a Nasdaq listed public sa…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers Appointment of Brian Parsley as a Director On September 5, 2025, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Dominari Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Brian Parsley as a director of the Company to fill the Class III vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. Ron Lieberman. Mr. Parsley has also been appointed to the audit and compensation committee…