Reading TRMK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TRMK free→Reading TRMK? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track TRMK free→
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is low, but the sector backdrop is a headwind, which could impact performance. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades (about fair); the read is fair, but weakening, as it is priced roughly in line with peers, but recent financials or earnings quality are weakening. If sector bellwethers like HDB, IBN, and PNC keep beating earnings and guiding higher, the Financials sector momentum should keep lifting TRMK and other Financials names. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $45.25. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $45 TRMK trades at 12× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $44 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 3% near-term growth, in line with our forecast of about 11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.83x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated fragile grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 60% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.95 → $0.96 (+0.7% / 30d). 4 raised, 1 cut, 6 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 17% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$80.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$188.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,067.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The sector is currently growing. If Trustmark's revenue growth drops, it may signal trouble ahead.
Confirms:Trustmark's revenue growth falls below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth stays above 10% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for TRMK yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 28, 2026, Trustmark Corporation issued a press release announcing its financial results for the period ended March 31, 2026. A copy of this press release and the accompanying financial statements and slide presentation are attached hereto as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Around its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Regional Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
TRMK Trustmark Corp. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | full | low |
HDB HDFC BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
IBN ICICI BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
ITUB ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING SA | — | — | moderate |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 2 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Maintain noninterest expense at stable levels to support profitability.
Continue to grow loans and deposits to enhance financial performance.
Implement a stock repurchase program to enhance shareholder value.
Why it matters: Slower loan growth could signal weakening demand or credit quality issues. This would impact overall revenue.
Confirms:Loan growth in Q2 reported at less than 1.5% linked-quarter.
Disproves:Loan growth in Q2 exceeds 1.5% linked-quarter.
Why it matters: Higher net charge-offs could indicate rising credit risk. This may affect investor confidence and stock performance.
Confirms:Net charge-offs in Q2 reported above 0.04% of average loans.
Disproves:Net charge-offs in Q2 remain at or below 0.04% of average loans.
Why it matters: Stock buybacks can show that management believes in the company. This can help the stock price.
Confirms:Trustmark plans stock buybacks of more than $25 million in Q2.
Disproves:No stock repurchases occur in Q2.
Why it matters: Inflation data impacts interest rates. This can change how Trustmark lends money.
Confirms one read:CPI shows a decrease. This means inflation is easing.
Confirms the other:CPI shows an increase. This means inflation is rising.
Why it matters: The earnings results will show how Trustmark is performing amid mixed signals. This is key for understanding its financial health.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share (EPS) exceeds $0.75, indicating strong performance.
Confirms the other:EPS is below $0.50. This means weaker performance.
Why it matters: Unemployment claims impact consumer spending. Higher claims may hurt Trustmark's loan performance.
Confirms:Weekly unemployment claims go up a lot. This shows economic stress.
Disproves:Weekly unemployment claims are falling. This shows the economy is stable.
Why it matters: If noninterest expense rises, it may show bad cost management. This can hurt profits.
Confirms:Noninterest expense was over $132.2 million in Q2.
Disproves:Noninterest expense remains at or below $132.2 million in Q2.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. Appointment of Chief Operating Officer of the Bank The Board of Directors of Trustmark Bank (the Bank), a wholly owned subsidiary of Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark), appointed Thomas C. Owens, 62, to serve as Chief Operating Officer of the Bank, effective May 1, 2026. Mr. Owens currently serves as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Trus…