Reading RGNX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RGNX free→Reading RGNX? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track RGNX free→NASDAQHealth CareBiotechnologySnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak. Earnings quality cannot be assessed since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been steady, and it has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is high, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 78% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is cheap, value-trap risk. This pattern occurs because it trades below peer multiples, but financials are weak. The read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $7.07. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $7.07 RGNX trades at 2× p/s, below its 9× p/s peer median. Our $32 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $12–$30. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 78% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about -60%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated weak grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=2391).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.81x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.10 → $0.12 (+19.4% / 30d). 1 raised, 2 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 91% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$292.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$673.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,464.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If the health care sector's revenue growth speeds up, it could help Regenxbio's performance. This would show a stronger market.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth is speeding up again. It could reach 10% or more.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth continues to slow below 10%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for RGNX yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8‑K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$12.00 – $30.00 (median $16.50) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-05-15
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Biotechnology.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
RGNX REGENXBIO, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 34 of 100 | inexpensive | high |
ABBV AbbVie | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 85 of 100 | fair | low |
AMGN Amgen | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
GILD Gilead Sciences | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 100 of 100 | fair | moderate |
VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 80 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by M&A activity. Historically, Health Care names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=618).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Maintain sufficient cash balance to fund operations into early 2027.
Stated in 3 of last 3 quarters. Cash balance decreased from $302.0 million in 2025-Q3 to $150.5 million in 2026-Q1. Despite the decrease, management maintains that the current cash balance will fund operations into early 2027, showing a recurring focus but limited substantive delivery on maintaining cash levels.
“REGENXBIO expects its cash balance of $150.5 million to fund operations into early 2027.”
“REGENXBIO expects its cash balance of $240.9 million to fund operations into early 2027.”
“REGENXBIO expects its cash balance of $302.0 million to fund operations into early 2027.”
Enter into a Settlement and Release Agreement with GSK to resolve the sublicense dispute.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. The company entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement with GSK to resolve a sublicense dispute. This action indicates a strategic move to address regulatory challenges, but financial impacts are not yet clear.
“REGENXBIO entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement with GSK to resolve a sublicense dispute.”
Respond to the FDA's Complete Response Letter regarding RGX-121.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. The company received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA regarding RGX-121, indicating a regulatory setback. Management's response to this issue will be critical for future product approvals, but no financial impact is detailed yet.
“The company received a CRL from the FDA regarding RGX-121.”
Why it matters: The earnings report will show if the company can improve its financial performance. Investors will look for signs of recovery.
Confirms one read:Earnings report shows revenue growth of at least 10% year over year.
Confirms the other:Earnings report shows revenue decline or flat growth year over year.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 18, 2026, REGENXBIO Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) to resolve non-binding mediation related to the License Agreement dated March 6, 2009, as amended on April 15, 2009, between GSK and the Company (as amended, the “GSK-REGENXBIO Sublicense”). As previously disclosed, the Company was notified of a dispute with GSK over the amount of sublicense…
of this Current Report on Form 8‑K and Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Other Events. On February 7, 2026, the Company received a CRL from the FDA regarding the Company’s BLA for RGX-121, the Company's investigational gene therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis type II.
Regulation FD Disclosure. On February 9, 2026, REGENXBIO Inc. (the “Company”) announced that it received a Complete Response Letter ("CRL") from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regarding the Company’s Biologics License Application ("BLA") for RGX-121, the Company's investigational gene therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis type II. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference. The information in