Reading OSBC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track OSBC free→Reading OSBC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track OSBC free→
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, though the capital stance is capital unfriendly. The sector backdrop is a headwind, and risk is moderate, with performance compared to sector peers being typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 5% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, quality intact. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $22.06. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $22 OSBC trades at 10× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $23 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 5% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 29%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated strong grew net income 67% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3733).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.64x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.54 → $0.55 (+1.7% / 30d). 3 raised, 1 cut, 5 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 80% of analysts rate Buy.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$94.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$223.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,292.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: The earnings report will provide insights into the bank's performance and market conditions. It is a key indicator of financial health.
Confirms one read:Earnings per share (EPS) is better than what analysts expected. This shows strong performance.
Confirms the other:EPS is lower than analyst expectations. This suggests weaker performance.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for OSBC yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Director — Dennis Klaeser: Mr. Klaeser resigned from the Board and Bank Board.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Regional Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
OSBC Old Second Bancorp, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 50 of 100 | fair | moderate |
HDB HDFC BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
IBN ICICI BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
ITUB ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING SA | — | — | moderate |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 2 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
4 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
The company has authorized a share repurchase program of up to $43.9 million.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. The company announced a share repurchase program of up to $43.9 million. As of the latest financials, there is no indication of shares repurchased under this program, indicating limited progress so far.
“The Board authorized the repurchase of up to $43.9 million of shares.”
The company continues to maintain its dividend per share at $0.07.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. Dividend per share increased from $0.06 in 2025-Q2 to $0.07 in 2026-Q1, showing a commitment to maintaining and slightly increasing shareholder returns. The trajectory is delivering on maintaining dividends.
“Dividend per share is maintained at $0.07.”
“Dividend per share was $0.06.”
“Dividend per share was $0.06.”
“Dividend per share was $0.06.”
The company aims to grow its operating income as a key financial metric.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. Operating income increased from $29.21 million in 2025-Q2 to $34.06 million in 2026-Q1, indicating progress in growing this key financial metric. The trajectory shows delivering on operating income growth.
Why it matters: The new CEO's vision will shape the bank's strategy and performance. Investors will look for clarity on future direction.
Confirms one read:A press release detailing the new CEO's strategic priorities and goals for the bank.
Confirms the other:The new CEO has not communicated clearly. There is still uncertainty about the bank's direction.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a slowdown in the financial sector, impacting OSBC's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth is below its median. This shows a possible slowdown.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth is above its median. This suggests continued expansion.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 22, 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company’s”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, along with certain other financial information. Copies of the Company’s press release and loan portfolio disclosures are attached as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On January 21, 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company’s”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025, along with certain other financial information. Copies of the Company’s press release and loan portfolio disclosures are attached as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively.
Other Events. The Board of Directors of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) has authorized the repurchase of up to $43.9 million of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Repurchase Program”). On January 27, 2026, the Company received a letter from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (the “Federal Reserve”) dated January 8, 2026, indicating its nonobjection to the Repurchase Program. Repurchases by the Company under the Repurchase Program may be made from time to time through open…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On October 22, 2025, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company’s”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, along with certain other financial information. Copies of the Company’s press release and loan portfolio disclosures are attached as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively.
“Operating income for 2026-Q1 was $34.06 million.”
“Operating income was $39.27 million.”
“Operating income was $13.07 million.”
“Operating income was $29.21 million.”