Reading LGL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LGL free→Reading LGL? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track LGL free→AMEXInformation TechnologyScientific & Technical InstrumentsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is weak, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady, and the capital stance is capital-friendly. Risk is elevated, but the sector backdrop is a tailwind, which may support performance compared with sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 94% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $6.95. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $6.88 LGL trades at 42× p/e — 1.5× the 28× p/e peer median. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $3.47 fair value is medium-confidence here. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 94% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 35%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated weak grew net income 63% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=2777).
Over the trailing year it converted 3.29x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated robust grew net income 69% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
9 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 64% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=1040).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.00 → $0.01. 0 raised, 0 cut, 1 covering analysts.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$139.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$410.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,719.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth falls, it may signal a slowdown affecting LGL's performance. This could impact investor confidence.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth drops below its median, indicating a slowdown.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for LGL yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the exhibits hereto, shall not be considered "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be incorporated by reference into any future filings by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Exchange Act, unless the Company expressly sets forth in such future filing that such information is…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
No score history yet for this stock.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Equipment & Instruments.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
LGL LGL Group Inc/The | — | expensive | elevated |
KEYS Keysight Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ROP Roper Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
TDY Teledyne Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | full | moderate |
TRMB Trimble Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
The company aims to complete the Rights Offering to raise approximately $45.2 million.
Focus on improving operating income, which has fluctuated significantly over recent quarters.
Efforts to stabilize revenue amidst fluctuations over recent quarters.
Other Events The Board of Directors of the Company approved the commencement of the Rights Offering to purchase shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock") to its existing stockholders of record of the Common Stock. The record date will be set once the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") declares the Form S-1 registration statement effective. Each holder of the Common Stock as of the record date will receive one (1) subscription right for each share o…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers On March 25, 2026, the Board of Directors of The LGL Group, Inc. (the "Company"), upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a modification to the compensatory arrangement for Jason Lamb, Chief Executive Officer. Effective January 5, 2026, the date on which Mr. Lamb commenced his service as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lamb will be…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers On January 5, 2026, the Company approved the compensation arrangement for Mr. Lamb in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. The material terms of Mr. Lamb's compensation are summarized below: (i) an annual draw of $60,000 against incentive compensation (the "Base Draw"); (ii) eligibility to receive incentive compensation for id…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers On January 5, 2026, Jason Lamb was appointed Chief Executive Officer of The LGL Group, Inc. (the "Company"), effective immediately. Mr. Lamb brings more than 20 years of leadership experience across special operations, intelligence, technology development, and private equity investing. He is a director of Teton Advisors and was a special advisor to…