Reading HMN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HMN free→Reading HMN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track HMN free→
NYSEFinancialsInsurance - Property & CasualtySnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, while earnings quality is robust, cash backs up reported profits. Management's recent track record has been steady, and risk is moderate. The sector backdrop is a headwind, but compared with sector peers, HMN is above typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 20% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. If HMN cuts guidance on the next call, that could have a meaningful negative impact. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $48.77. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $49 HMN trades at 10× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $61 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 20% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 7%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 2.87x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated robust grew net income 62% of the time over the next year (vs 54% for the rest of the cohort, n=3541).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.78 → $0.74 (-4.5% / 30d). 0 raised, 0 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 67% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$90.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$209.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,073.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Paying dividends shows the company is doing well. It gives investors confidence.
Confirms:A dividend payment that is the same or higher than before is a good sign.
Disproves:No dividend payment announced or a cut in the dividend.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for HMN yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 6, 2026, the Company issued a news release reporting its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s Investor Supplement and Investor Presentation will also be posted on the investors page of its website, investors.horacemann.com.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Multi-line Insurance.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
HMN Horace Mann Educators Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | fair | moderate |
AIG American International Group | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 74 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
L Loews Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 67 of 100 | fair | low |
AIZ Assurant | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 93 of 100 | fair | moderate |
AFG American Financial Group | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 40 of 100 | fair | moderate |
1 material management or governance event in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 56% for the rest of the cohort, n=3736).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on driving revenue growth across all segments.
Improve operating income through cost management and efficiency.
Continue to provide consistent dividend payments to shareholders.
Why it matters: Keeping dividends shows financial strength. It helps build investor trust.
Confirms:Dividends are paid in Q2 without cuts.
Disproves:Dividends are reduced or suspended in Q2.
Why it matters: An earnings miss would indicate ongoing challenges and could hurt investor confidence. It follows the recent earnings miss.
Confirms:The Q2 earnings report did not meet analyst expectations.
Disproves:Q2 earnings report beats what analysts expected.
Why it matters: The company aims to increase revenue growth. A strong Q2 report would show progress.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 5% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth is below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: Better core earnings would help increase operating income.
Confirms:Core earnings per share increases by more than 10% in Q2.
Disproves:Core earnings per share decreases or stays flat in Q2.
Why it matters: Better operating income means improved cost management. It can also help how investors feel.
Confirms:Operating income increases year over year in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income declines year over year in Q2.
Why it matters: A drop below 5% would signal a slowdown in growth. This could change investor sentiment.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported above 5% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth reported below 0% year over year.
Why it matters: A drop in operating income may mean cost management is not working. This raises worries about profits.
Confirms:Operating income drops below $500M in Q2.
Disproves:Operating income stays above $502M in Q2.
Why it matters: High catastrophe costs can hurt earnings and affect financial stability. Monitoring this is vital.
Confirms:Catastrophe costs reported above $5 million for the quarter.
Disproves:Catastrophe costs reported below $2 million for the quarter.
Why it matters: A drop in sector revenue growth could signal broader economic issues. This affects Horace Mann's performance.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth falls below its median of 12% in the next quarter.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth stays above its median of 12% in the next quarter.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 3, 2026, the Company issued a news release reporting its financial results for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.2 and is incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s Investor Supplement and Investor Presentation will also be posted on the investors page of its website, investors.horacemann.com.
Other Events On September 29, 2025 , Horace Mann Educators Corporation issued a notice of redemption for all of its outstanding 4.500% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “Notes”). The redemption is expected to occur on October 14, 2025 (the “Redemption Date”). The Notes are redeemable at a redemption price that is equal to the sum of 100% of the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but not including, the Redemption Date. This Form 8-K does not cons…