Reading GMED? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GMED free→Reading GMED? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GMED free→
NYSEHealth CareMedical DevicesSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, and management's recent track record has been steady. Earnings quality is neutral, and the company has a capital-friendly stance. Risk is moderate, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, with GMED trading above typical levels compared to sector peers. Peer multiples imply a price about 24% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $77.54. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $77 GMED trades at 17× p/e, below its 23× p/e peer median. Our $101 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $100–$117. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 23% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 38%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.33x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.10 → $1.10 (+0.2% / 30d). 12 raised, 1 cut, 13 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 69% of analysts rate Buy.
1 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 24.4% above current price.
0 positive, 0 negative / 30d.
Market and fundamentals agree. Analysts are positioned bullishly on a fundamentally strong name.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$127.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$302.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,195.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A slowdown in revenue growth could signal challenges in maintaining momentum after a strong Q1.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth is reported below 25% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth exceeds 25% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for GMED yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release reporting, among other things, its sales and operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with general instruction B.2 to Form 8-K, the information included in this Item 2.02, and the exhibit attached hereto, shall be deemed to be…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$100.00 – $117.00 (median $109.00) · 4 analysts · as of 2026-06-15
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Cheaper than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 95 of 100 | fair | moderate |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | fair | moderate |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SYK Stryker Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MDT Medtronic | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
2 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=618).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on increasing revenue growth through strategic initiatives and market expansion.
Continue efforts to enhance operating income through cost management and efficiency improvements.
Focus on increasing net income through revenue growth and cost efficiency.
Why it matters: A slowdown in net income growth may show problems with costs or sales. This is important for checking overall performance.
Confirms:Net income growth reported below 50% year over year.
Disproves:Net income growth reported at or above 50% year over year.
Why it matters: If sector revenue growth drops, it may impact GMED's growth potential. This is important for understanding market conditions.
Confirms:Sector revenue growth reported below its median.
Disproves:Sector revenue growth remains above its median.
Why it matters: Changes in the board can affect company plans and trust from investors.
Confirms one read:A new board member with industry experience has been announced.
Confirms the other:There are no new board members or negative comments about board changes.
Why it matters: If EPS falls below this target, it may show less profit and problems.
Confirms:Non-GAAP EPS reported below $4.70 for the full year.
Disproves:Non-GAAP EPS reported above $4.70 for the full year.
Why it matters: Higher EPS shows good cost management and strong profits. This helps investor confidence.
Confirms:Non-GAAP EPS for Q2 exceeds $1.15.
Disproves:Non-GAAP EPS for Q2 falls below $1.10.
Why it matters: Board changes can affect strategy and governance. This impacts how investors feel.
Confirms one read:Announcement of new board members or changes in governance structure.
Confirms the other:No changes to the board or governance structure have been announced.
Why it matters: Strong operating income growth shows good cost control. It helps the company's growth plans.
Confirms:Operating income growth is over 50% compared to last year.
Disproves:Operating income growth is below 50% compared to last year.
The filing describes an amendment to the equity incentive plan, not a management change.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On March 23, 2026, John A. DeFord, Ph.D., a member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Globus Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), informed the Company of his resignation from the Board effective immediately. Dr. DeFord’s decision was not a result of any disagreement with the Company.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 24, 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release reporting, among other things, its sales and operating results for the three and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with general instruction B.2 to Form 8-K, the information included in this Item 2.02, and the exhibit attached hereto, s…