Reading EW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EW free→Reading EW? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track EW free→NYSEHealth CareMedical DevicesSnapshot 2026-06-15
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is strong, but management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent disruptive corporate changes. Earnings quality is mixed, and the sector backdrop is a headwind, which may impact future results. Peer multiples imply a price about 37% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. Key factors to watch include any guidance cuts from EW and the performance of sector bellwethers like ABT, SYK, and MDT. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 8 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $86.31. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $86 the market pays 32× p/e — above the 23× p/e peer median but in line with its own 32× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $63 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts: $85–$110. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 37% near-term growth, ahead of our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Health Care names rated strong grew net income 59% of the time over the next year (vs 52% for the rest of the cohort, n=2344).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.24x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Health Care names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 50% for the rest of the cohort, n=2269).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.74 → $0.74 (+0.1% / 30d). 1 raised, 1 cut, 23 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 1 maintained. 72% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$108.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$222.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,273.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Valuation label changed from 'full' to 'expensive'.
Valuation changed. It rose to an expensive label. The sector backdrop fell. It is now a headwind. Risk remains moderate. Management is volatile. Recent financial performance is strong.
as of 2026-06-15
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Strong TMTT sales growth will confirm the success of new therapies like EVOQUE and PASCAL. This is key for overall revenue growth.
Confirms:TMTT sales growth exceeds 35% year over year in 2026.
Disproves:TMTT sales growth is below 35% year over year in 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for EW yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On May 4, 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), announced that Theodora Mistras has been appointed as the Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective May 29, 2026, to succeed Scott B. Ullem in that position. Ms. Mistras, age 44, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Viatri…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$85.00 – $110.00 (median $94.00) · 6 analysts · as of 2026-04-27
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Health Care Equipment.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
EW Edwards Lifesciences | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | fair | moderate |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
SYK Stryker Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 71 of 100 | fair | moderate |
MDT Medtronic | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 89 of 100 | fair | moderate |
13 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Health Care names rated volatile grew net income 43% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=600).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
via XLV
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-15.
Met or beat guidance 63% of the last 8 guided quarters · -12.2% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Edwards Lifesciences aims to increase its sales growth guidance for 2026.
Edwards Lifesciences is raising the midpoint of its full-year adjusted EPS guidance.
Edwards Lifesciences is expanding its TAVR sales growth guidance for 2026.
For the second quarter of 2026, the company projects total sales to be between $1.66 and $1.74 billion.
Why it matters: The sale is key for Edwards to focus on structural heart innovations. It could improve their financial flexibility.
Confirms:The deal will close by the end of 2024. All regulatory approvals will be obtained.
Disproves:The transaction fails to close due to regulatory issues or other conditions not being met.
Why it matters: The new CFO's plans could influence Edwards' financial strategy and growth outlook.
Confirms one read:The new CFO announces a clear strategic plan that aligns with growth goals.
Confirms the other:The new CFO's initiatives are vague or do not align with growth expectations.
Why it matters: Changes in TAVR sales guidance will signal the strength of Edwards' heart valve business.
Confirms one read:TAVR sales growth guidance is raised above 15% year over year.
Confirms the other:TAVR sales growth guidance is lowered below 5% year over year.
Why it matters: The new CFO's strategies could influence Edwards' financial performance and growth plans.
Confirms one read:The company had good financial results. This is due to new strategies from the CFO.
Confirms the other:The company had bad financial results. This is linked to the new CFO's strategies.
Why it matters: The PROGRESS trial results will show how well TAVR works for moderate aortic stenosis. Good results could lead to more use of TAVR.
Confirms:Positive results from the PROGRESS trial presented at the TCT conference.
Disproves:Negative results from the PROGRESS trial or no presentation at the TCT conference.
Why it matters: A favorable CMS decision could improve access to TAVR therapy, boosting sales. This is critical for expanding the patient base.
Confirms:CMS makes a positive decision on TAVR coverage.
Disproves:CMS keeps or denies changes to TAVR coverage.
Why it matters: This projection will indicate if Edwards is on track to meet its growth targets.
Confirms:Sales growth projection for Q2 2026 exceeds 10% year over year.
Disproves:Sales growth projection for Q2 2026 falls below 5% year over year.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers Approval of the Amended and Restated Long-Term Stock Incentive Compensation Program At the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), the Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Long-Term Stock Incentive Compensation Pr…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Edwards”), issued a press release setting forth Edwards’ financial results for the first quarter of 2026. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information furnished under this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 10, 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Edwards”), issued a press release setting forth Edwards’ financial results for the fourth quarter of 2025. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information furnished under this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a…
Other Events. On January 9, 2026 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has granted the motion from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission for an injunction blocking the Company’s proposed acquisition of JenaValve Technology, Inc (“JenaValve”). As a result, the Company will not acquire JenaValve. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by referen…