Reading FMBH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FMBH free→Reading FMBH? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track FMBH free→
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
FMBH shows a mixed quality-and-value setup, with recent financial performance being neutral and management's track record being volatile, alongside a capital-unfriendly stance. Earnings quality is also neutral, and the sector backdrop presents a headwind, while risk is moderate. Peer multiples imply a price about 10% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis), and the read is fair. The outlook hinges on guidance changes and sector trends, particularly how bellwethers perform. This analysis is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $46.00. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $46 FMBH trades at 11× p/e, below its 12× p/e peer median. Our $51 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Analysts: $47–$55. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 10% below a flat-multiple fair value, below our forecast of about 17%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 52% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=4936).
Over the trailing year it converted 1.13x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 55% for the rest of the cohort, n=4725).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $1.08 → $1.10 (+1.8% / 30d). 5 raised, 1 cut, 7 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 57% of analysts rate Buy.
Transition story with positive analyst positioning (often a turnaround setup).
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$98.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$227.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $1,393.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Retail sales data can influence consumer spending trends. This affects the overall economy and First Mid's performance.
Confirms one read:Retail sales increase by more than 1% month over month.
Confirms the other:Retail sales decrease by more than 1% month over month.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for FMBH yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On April 29, 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) announced a planned leadership transition as part of its long-term succession planning process. Effective July 1, 2026, Matthew K. Smith will become Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and its subsidiary, First Mid Bank & Trust, N.A., and will be appointed to the Company…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$47.00 – $55.00 (median $48.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-05-04
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Regional Banks.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
FMBH First Mid Bancshares, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | fair | moderate |
HDB HDFC BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
IBN ICICI BANK LTD | — | — | moderate |
ITUB ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING SA | — | — | moderate |
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 2 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
19 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated volatile grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 57% for the rest of the cohort, n=3774).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Focus on achieving record earnings per share and net income.
Implement planned leadership transition with new CEO appointment.
Focus on capital allocation with new credit agreements and obligations.
Why it matters: Strong earnings may show that the company is gaining momentum. This could boost investor confidence.
Confirms:Earnings report shows a significant increase in earnings per share compared to last year.
Disproves:Earnings report shows a decline in earnings per share compared to last year.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth would signal a slowdown in the financial sector. This could impact First Mid's performance and investor sentiment.
Confirms:Revenue growth falls below the median of 15% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains at or above the median of 15% year over year.
and the related exhibits shall not be deemed "filed" by First Mid for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. Forward Looking Statements This document may contain certain forward-looking statements about First Mid, such as discussions…
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On April 10, 2026, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Business Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Bankers’ Bank (the “Lender”), pursuant to which the Lender provides the Company with a revolving line of credit in a principal amount of up to $15.0 million (the “Line of Credit”). The Line of Credit is evidenced by a Promissory Note dated April 10, 2026 (the “Revolving Note”). Under the Revolving Note, the Company may req…
Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement. The Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 12, 2019, as amended (the “Northern Trust Credit Agreement”), by and between First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and The Northern Trust Company, matured in accordance with its terms on April 3, 2026, and was terminated effective as of such date. At maturity, no amounts were outstanding. The Northern Trust Credit Agreement provided for a $15.0 million revolving credit facili…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant. The information provided in