Reading ACFN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACFN free→Reading ACFN? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ACFN free→
NASDAQInformation TechnologyScientific & Technical InstrumentsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and earnings quality is fragile, reported profits aren't backed by cash. Management's recent track record has been steady, but risk is elevated. The sector backdrop is a tailwind, and compared with sector peers, ACFN is typical. Peer multiples imply a price about 18% above where it trades (it looks cheap on this basis); the read is fair, but weakening. This assessment is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 5 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $16.50. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $16 ACFN trades at 20× p/e, below its 28× p/e peer median. Our $19 fair value sits above the price; high confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price implies about 19% below a flat-multiple fair value, in line with our forecast of about -12%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only weak execution quality, a turbulent sector regime (Heating) — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted 0.95x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Information Technology names rated fragile grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 65% for the rest of the cohort, n=2129).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the broad stock market, the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
3 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by executive changes. Historically, Information Technology names rated stable grew net income 56% of the time over the next year (vs 62% for the rest of the cohort, n=797).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$239.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$660.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $5,811.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Management rose by 16.9 points (from 54.8 to 71.7).
Confidence changed from 'high' to 'medium'.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: If Acorn's revenue growth falls, it may show a weaker position in a slowing sector.
Confirms:Acorn's revenue growth falls below the sector median growth rate.
Disproves:Acorn's revenue growth remains above the sector median growth rate.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
No graded news catalysts for ACFN yet.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
No upside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
No downside scenarios in the latest snapshot.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, the Registrant issued a press release announcing its 2026 first quarter results. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Electronic Equipment & Instruments.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ACFN Acorn Energy Inc | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 53 of 100 | fair | elevated |
KEYS Keysight Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
ROP Roper Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 96 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
TDY Teledyne Technologies | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | full | moderate |
TRMB Trimble Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 94 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Target a 20% average annual revenue growth over the next three to five years.
Stated in 4 of last 4 quarters. Revenue decreased from $3,525,000 in 2025-Q2 to $2,227,000 in 2026-Q1, indicating limited progress towards the 20% growth target. Despite consistent emphasis on this goal, the recent revenue trajectory does not align with the stated growth objective.
“We remain focused on our objective of achieving three-to-five year average revenue growth of 20% or more.”
“We continue to target 20% average annual revenue growth over the next three to five years.”
“We continue to target 20% average top line growth over the next three-to-five years.”
“We believe we can grow our revenue at an average annual rate of 20% or more.”
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On March 5, 2026, the Registrant issued a press release announcing its 2025 fourth quarter and full-year results. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. 1. (a) On January 19, 2026, the Registrant entered into a new consulting agreement (the “Loeb Consulting Agreement”) between Jan H. Loeb and the Registrant extending its arrangements for compensation of Mr. Loeb for his services as President and CEO of the Registrant and as principal executive officer of the Registrant’s OmniMetrix subsidiary in th…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On November 6, 2025, the Registrant issued a press release announcing its 2025 third quarter results. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On August 7, 2025, the Registrant issued a press release announcing its 2025 second quarter results. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.