Reading ZIP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ZIP free→Reading ZIP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ZIP free→
NYSECommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral, and management's recent track record has been fairly steady. The company was unprofitable over the past year, so its earnings quality can't be assessed. Peer multiples imply a price about 253% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified, as it is rich on today's multiple, but the three-year horizon reads cheaper once expected earnings growth is included. If ZIP cuts guidance on the next call, that would be a meaningful negative. This read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 4 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $3.37. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $3.65 ZIP trades at 1× p/s, below its 1× p/s peer median. Our $0.96 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 279% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about -11%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Crisis) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=902).
Over the trailing year it converted -0.70x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity, real (inflation-adjusted) rates.
6 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 63% for the rest of the cohort, n=271).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.09 → $0.08 (-8.8% / 30d). 1 raised, 1 cut, 2 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 20% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$431.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$796.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,949.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More unemployment claims could mean a weaker job market. This may affect ZipRecruiter's business.
Confirms:Weekly unemployment claims go above 300,000 for two weeks in a row.
Disproves:Weekly unemployment claims stay under 300,000 for two weeks in a row.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Risks to user trust may impact competitive positioning.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On May 7, 2026, ZipRecruiter, Inc. (“ZipRecruiter” or the "Company") issued a press release (the “Press Release”) and will hold a conference call (the “Earnings Call” announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 and financial outlook. The Company also published a letter to shareholders announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 and financial outlook (the “Shareholder Letter”). Copies of the Pres…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Interactive Media & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ZIP ZipRecruiter, Inc. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 46 of 100 | expensive | high |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 84 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
GOOG Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 87 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
META Meta Platforms | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
RDDT REDDIT, INC. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 54 of 100 | expensive | high |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Management aims to achieve flat year-over-year revenue in 2026 compared to a 5% decline in 2025.
Stated in 2 of last 2 quarters. Revenue was $107.5M in 2026-Q1, down from $111.67M in 2025-Q4, indicating a decline. Management's goal of flat year-over-year revenue in 2026 shows limited progress so far.
“We started 2026 with disciplined execution, delivering Q1 results above the midpoint of our guidance.”
“We believe a likely result in this scenario is for us to achieve flat year-over-year revenue in 2026.”
Management expects adjusted EBITDA margins to expand by 5 percentage points from 9% in 2025 to 14% in 2026.
Newly stated in 2025-Q4. Management aims to expand adjusted EBITDA margins by 5 percentage points from 9% in 2025 to 14% in 2026. No specific margin data for 2026-Q1 is available to assess progress.
“We expect adjusted EBITDA margins to expand by 5 percentage points from 9% in 2025 to 14% in 2026.”
Management emphasizes disciplined execution to achieve financial targets in 2026.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. Management highlights disciplined execution as a priority, with Q1 results above the midpoint of guidance. However, revenue declined from $111.67M in 2025-Q4 to $107.5M in 2026-Q1, indicating challenges.
“We started 2026 with disciplined execution, delivering Q1 results above the midpoint of our guidance.”
Why it matters: If revenue grows, it may show a turnaround for ZipRecruiter during a sector decline.
Confirms:Q2 revenue growth reported above 0% year over year.
Disproves:Q2 revenue growth reported below 0% year over year.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On February 23, 2026, Timothy Yarbrough notified the Company of his decision to resign from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective as of 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time) on February 25, 2026. Mr. Yarbrough is departing to pursue another opportunity. Mr. Yarbrough’s decision was not the result of any disagreement with the Company…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 25, 2026, ZipRecruiter, Inc. (“ZipRecruiter” or the "Company") issued a press release (the “Press Release”) and will hold a conference call (the “Earnings Call” announcing its financial results for the year ended December 31, 2025 and financial outlook. The Company also published a letter to shareholders announcing its financial results for the year ended December 31, 2025 and financial outlook (the “Shareholder Letter”). Copies of th…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On February 5, 2026, Yvonne Hao notified ZipRecruiter, Inc. (the “Company”) of her decision to resign from the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), including from the Audit Committee of the Board (the “Audit Committee”) and the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”), effective immediately. Ms. Hao’s resignation di…
Other Events. On November 17, 2025, ZipRecruiter, Inc. (the “Company”) repurchased 1,750,547 shares of its Class A common stock, $0.00001 par value per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), from certain entities affiliated with Institutional Venture Partners (“IVP”) at a purchase price of $4.57 per share, pursuant to a Share Repurchase Agreement entered into on November 13, 2025. The transaction was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and was effected pursuant to the Company’s existing sh…