REDDIT, INC. (RDDT)
NYSECommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-10-29
NYSECommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put RDDT beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Communication Services is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar under pressure — Achieve adjusted EBITDA of $285M to $295M in 2026-Q2: Comparison needs review.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 67% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityManagement screens strong on capital allocation, earnings delivery, the balance sheet.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 53% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskReddit’s thesis rests on global user engagement sustaining revenue growth, despite slower recent growth. Revenue grew 53% year over year in Q3 2026, down from 61% in Q2; Q3 earnings beat. Reddit trades at 23× P/E versus a 14× peer median, though expectations look modest versus our growth view. The premium could compress if user engagement weakens, especially as search traffic may decline. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 26%. The thesis is on watch because its adjusted EBITDA comparison needs review; peer multiples imply a price about 22% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis). This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-29. RDDT is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 34 analysts currently covering RDDT (as of Oct 2026).
Based on 17 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for RDDT in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare RDDT with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDDT Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 11 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Interactive Media & Services — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put RDDT next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Sustain strong revenue growth and profitability
DAU deceleration and weak guidance pressure growth expectations and triggered a sharp share-price decline.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-29. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $129.60
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $129.60.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 10% on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.

Advances: Sustain strong revenue growth and profitability
Q4 revenue forecast signals continued growth; logged-in-only testing adds monetization uncertainty.

Advances: Revenue growth target for 2026-Q2
Reported Q3 sales beat supports revenue growth, though the 12.6% stock decline signals investor concerns.

Advances: Sustain strong revenue growth and profitability
Revenue and GAAP EPS exceeded estimates, supporting growth and profitability.

Threatens: Increase user engagement metrics globally
Market decline may impact user engagement negatively.

Advances: Increase user engagement metrics globally
User growth supports increased engagement metrics globally.

Threatens: Maintain high gross margin and improve operating efficiency
Employee claims may impact operating efficiency and morale.

Leadership instability could impact strategic execution and user engagement.
