REDDIT, INC. (RDDT)
NYSECommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-09-14
$162.38+2.92%
Close 2026-09-14 · 1-day change
NYSECommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-09-14
Research Workspace
Put RDDT beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Communication Services is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar broken — Achieve adjusted EBITDA of $285M to $295M in 2026-Q2: EBITDA $290M vs $285M-$295M target.
View ThesisRevenue is growing steadily — about 67% over the past year.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityManagement screens strong on capital allocation, earnings delivery.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 3% on a typical day and fell roughly 55% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskRDDT's growth relies on sustaining strong revenue growth and profitability, especially after recent earnings. Revenue increased by 61% year over year, and the last quarter beat expectations with a 26% surprise. It trades at 28× P/E versus a peer median of 13×, indicating that the price reflects less growth than anticipated. The primary risk is the potential for a guidance cut, with a 20% probability of a miss next quarter. Peer multiples imply a price about 17% below where it trades. Our read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-09-14. RDDT is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 34 analysts currently covering RDDT (as of Sep 2026).
Based on 16 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for RDDT in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare RDDT with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDDT Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 11 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-14. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Interactive Media & Services — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put RDDT next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advertising challenges could impact revenue growth.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-09-14. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $162.38
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $162.38.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 10% on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Advances: Increase user engagement metrics globally
User growth hitting fastest pace supports engagement objectives.
Advances: Increase user engagement metrics globally
8% user growth aligns with increasing engagement metrics.
Threatens: Maintain high gross margin and improve operating efficiency
Concerns about layoffs could impact operating efficiency.
Advances: Sustain strong revenue growth and profitability
Licensing relief supports revenue growth and profitability.
Advances: Sustain strong revenue growth and profitability
Inclusion in S&P 500 boosts visibility and credibility.
Advances: Sustain strong revenue growth and profitability
AI content news may enhance user engagement and revenue.
Threatens: Maintain high gross margin and improve operating efficiency
Toxic work culture may impact operating efficiency.
