Reading ZG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ZG free→Reading ZG? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track ZG free→
NASDAQCommunication ServicesInternet Content & InformationSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance is holding in the top half of its industry — the reason to own it looks intact.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is robust, cash backs up profits. Management's recent track record has been fairly steady. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a headwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 114% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. This is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $33.51. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $33 ZG trades at 24× p/e — 2.0× the 12× p/e peer median. The market is re-rating it beyond its own range; our $16 fair value is low-confidence here. Analysts: $40–$75. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 114% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 13%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 46% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=902).
Over the trailing year it converted 7.61x of net income into operating cash flow. Historically, Communication Services names rated robust grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 49% for the rest of the cohort, n=525).
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.45 → $0.45 (+0.4% / 30d). 1 raised, 11 cut, 14 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d, 3 maintained. 56% of analysts rate Buy.
2 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 58.2% above current price.
1 positive, 0 negative / 30d. See F4 management tile for the event list.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$209.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$457.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $6,286.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: More cash from operations means better financial health. It supports future investments.
Confirms:Cash from operating activities grows by more than 15% year over year in Q2.
Disproves:Cash from operations goes down or increases by less than 5%.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Valuation insights support investment thesis.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Other Events. On June 3, 2026, the Board approved an amendment (the “ Amendment ”) to the Company’s previously announced 2026 repurchase program (the “ 2026 Repurchase Program ”), pursuant to which the Board had authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $1.25 billion of the Company’s Class A common stock, Class C capital stock or a combination thereof. Pursuant to the Amendment, effective June 3, 2026, no repurchase of shares under the 2026 Repurchase Program is permitted if, after giv…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$40.00 – $75.00 (median $54.50) · 10 analysts · as of 2026-06-12
Looks more expensive than peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Interactive Media & Services.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
ZG ZILLOW GROUP INC | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 64 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 81 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
GOOG Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | expensive | moderate |
META Meta Platforms | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 76 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
RDDT REDDIT, INC. | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 55 of 100 | expensive | high |
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Communication Services names rated neutral grew net income 53% of the time over the next year (vs 63% for the rest of the cohort, n=271).
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLC
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Expand the 2026 repurchase program with an additional $1.25 billion authorization for Class A and Class C stock.
Focus on improving operating income through cost management and revenue growth.
Increase cash generated from operating activities to support business operations.
Why it matters: Improving operating income shows the company is managing costs well. It can lead to better profits.
Confirms:Q2 operating income increases year over year by more than 10%.
Disproves:Operating income decreases or stays flat year over year.
Why it matters: Finishing the buyback program shows good use of money. It may help investor trust.
Confirms:The company completes the buyback of $1.25 billion in shares as planned.
Disproves:The company does not finish the buyback program or takes too long.
Why it matters: If the sector's revenue growth turns positive, it may help Zillow's performance.
Confirms one read:Sector revenue growth shows a positive change, exceeding 0% year over year.
Confirms the other:Sector revenue growth remains negative year over year.
Securities class action could impact reputation.
Google threat could impact market position.
Stock hitting low could affect investor sentiment.
Data feed suspension could impact listings.
Loss of listings could impact market position.
CEO's vision could enhance strategic direction.
and Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Other Events. On March 4, 2026, Zillow Group’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $1.25 billion of its Class A common stock, Class C capital stock or a combination thereof. The purchases may be made in open-market transactions or privately negotiated transactions, or in such other manner as deemed appropriate by management, and may be made from time to time as determined by management depending on market conditions, share price, trading volume, cash needs and…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. Zillow Group, Inc. today issued a press release and a shareholder letter announcing its financial results for the fiscal quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. The full text of the press release issued in connection with the announcement is furnished as Exhibit 99.1, accompanying supporting tables as Exhibit 99.2, and the shareholder letter as Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The information in this
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On January 30, 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) by and among the Company, MFTB Holdco, Inc., Zillow, Inc. (the “Borrower”), the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Lenders”), Goldman Sachs Bank USA as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”) and as an issuing bank, and the other issuing banks from time to time party thereto. The Credit Agreement pro…