EchoStar (SATS)
NASDAQCommunication ServicesAsset Management - CryptocurrencySnapshot 2026-10-29
$93.25-2.05%
Close 2026-10-30 · 1-day change
NASDAQCommunication ServicesAsset Management - CryptocurrencySnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put SATS beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Communication Services is in steady. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar under pressure — Operating income improves to positive territory: Comparison needs review.
View ThesisRevenue is contracting — down about 5% over the past year.
View GrowthManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, margins, the balance sheet.
View ManagementExpectations look high — what the market is pricing in runs ahead of what analysts forecast.
View ValuationModerate volatility — typically moves about 2% a day.
View RiskSATS depends on revenue growth, but the desk has no earnings history or release. Its latest result and revenue trajectory therefore cannot be verified. SATS trades at 2.3× sales, versus 1.0× for peers and 1.6× historically. The market prices in more growth than our forecast. Our model puts the next-quarter miss probability near 39%. The operating-income pillar needs review because its comparison is unverified. Peer multiples imply a price about 12% above where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-30. SATS is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 6 analysts currently covering SATS (as of Jun 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare SATS with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATS Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 2 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-30. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Communication Services (broad) — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Our valuation methods disagree too much on this name right now. Rather than print a number we don't believe, we're holding it back until they converge.
Compare the value case
Put SATS next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Threatens: Restructuring for strategic optionality
Regulatory scrutiny could hinder strategic optionality.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-30. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Above average on quality vs scored peers
A second lens on the 12-month fair value: for companies that score high on measured quality (profitability, balance-sheet safety, earnings stability), this read trusts more of today's profit margins instead of averaging them toward their multi-year history the way the headline number does. Shown alongside the fair value above, not in place of it. A diagnostic, not a price target or a buy/sell signal.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
Advances: Restructuring for strategic optionality
Approval enhances financial flexibility for restructuring efforts.
Threatens: Increase financial flexibility for M&A
Liabilities may hinder financial flexibility for M&A.
Advances: Increase financial flexibility for M&A
Deconsolidation aligns with M&A financial flexibility objective.
Threatens: Restructuring for strategic optionality
Bankruptcy filing undermines restructuring and financial flexibility objectives.
Threatens: Restructuring for strategic optionality
Bankruptcy undermines restructuring efforts and financial flexibility.
Advances: Increase financial flexibility for M&A
Sale enhances financial flexibility for future M&A opportunities.
Threatens: CEO transition to drive strategic changes
CEO resignation may hinder strategic changes.