First Seacoast Bancorp Inc (FSEA)
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-10-29
NASDAQFinancialsBanks - RegionalSnapshot 2026-10-29
Research Workspace
Put FSEA beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Management is running behind on a stated commitment.
View ThesisRevenue growth is slowing — up about 2% over the past year and decelerating.
View GrowthManagement screens weak on capital allocation, the balance sheet, market reaction to earnings.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 0% on a typical day and fell roughly 22% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskFSEA’s case rests on bank earnings strength, yet its recent financial performance is weak and earnings history is unavailable. The desk records no earnings release, so recent growth and the latest beat cannot be verified. FSEA trades at 1× book value versus 1× for peers. The desk says expectations look modest compared with its view. Management is running behind on a stated commitment, creating a company-specific risk. Peer multiples imply a price in line with where it trades; this read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-10-05. FSEA is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Continue this research
Compare FSEA with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Compare now without an account. Saving and monitoring require an account.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSEA Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-10-29. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Regional Banks — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put FSEA next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-10-05. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Above average on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.