Reading INTC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track INTC free→Reading INTC? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track INTC free→NASDAQInformation TechnologySemiconductorsSnapshot 2026-06-16
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
Recent financial performance is neutral. Earnings quality is not assessable since the company was unprofitable over the past year. Management's recent track record has been unsteady, with frequent changes. Risk is elevated, and the sector backdrop is a tailwind. Peer multiples imply a price about 80% below where it trades (it looks expensive on this basis); the read is expensive, growth-justified. If INTC cuts guidance on the next call, that could be a meaningful negative.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 6 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $117.05. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
No-growth: today's peer multiple on trailing earnings. The headline read.
Embeds projected growth. Leans optimistic by design. Upside context.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $117 INTC trades at 11× p/s, below its 11× p/s peer median. Our $65 fair value sits above the price; low confidence. Analysts: $60–$150. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The market is pricing in roughly 80% near-term growth, well above our forecast of about 1%. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
Only expensive valuation — not the full expensive x weak x turbulent stack. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 1 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Information Technology names rated neutral grew net income 54% of the time over the next year (vs 68% for the rest of the cohort, n=3704).
Over the trailing year it converted -3.14x of net income into operating cash flow.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, Fed net liquidity, long-term interest rates.
26 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Information Technology names rated volatile grew net income 58% of the time over the next year (vs 61% for the rest of the cohort, n=793).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.21 → $0.21 (+0.1% / 30d). 31 raised, 0 cut, 33 covering analysts.
1 upgrade, 0 downgrades / 30d, 5 maintained. 26% of analysts rate Buy.
4 PT revisions / 30d. Avg target 8.7% above current price.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$303.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$576.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,417.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
No material changes since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-06-16
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Recent departures can affect how the company runs. Stability is important for growth.
Confirms:No new executives left the company by Q3 2026.
Disproves:Another big executive will leave by Q3 2026.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Advances: Ramp Intel 18A production
New tech supports ramping Intel 18A production.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On April 24,2026, Scott Gawel, Corporate Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Intel Corporation (the "Company"), resigned from the position of principal accounting officer, effective immediately, to pursue another career opportunity. At such time, Mr. David A. Zinsner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, a…
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Long-thesis check; widest uncertainty.
$60.00 – $150.00 (median $83.00) · 29 analysts · as of 2026-06-01
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q1, 2025-Q2, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Semiconductors.
| Stock | Sector standing | Valuation | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 32 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 88 of 100 | inexpensive | moderate |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | — | — | moderate |
AVGO Broadcom | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | inexpensive | elevated |
MU Micron Technology | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 82 of 100 | expensive | elevated |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
via XLK
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-06-16.
Met or beat guidance 88% of the last 8 guided quarters · 46.2% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
Intel is focused on ramping up production of Intel 18A to meet demand and improve yields.
Intel aims to expand its AI-driven businesses, leveraging its x86 CPU franchise and advanced packaging technology.
Intel is focused on maximizing and optimizing factory output to meet customer demand.
Intel is committed to reducing operating expenses and improving efficiency across the organization.
Why it matters: Earnings results will show if Intel continues to meet growth expectations.
Confirms one read:Q2 earnings exceed $14 billion in revenue.
Confirms the other:Q2 earnings fall below $12 billion in revenue.
Why it matters: Intel 18A is crucial for future products. Delays could hurt growth plans.
Confirms:Intel 18A production ramp achieves 50% yield by Q3 2026.
Disproves:Production yield remains below 30% by Q3 2026.
Why it matters: Factory output is critical for meeting demand. Shortfalls could impact revenue.
Confirms:Factory output increases by at least 20% by Q3 2026.
Disproves:Factory output does not improve or declines by Q3 2026.
Why it matters: Partnerships can enhance Intel's position in the AI market and drive new revenue streams.
Confirms:A new partnership for AI inference workloads will be announced by Q3 2026.
Disproves:No new partnerships have been announced. This shows a pause in the AI strategy.
Why it matters: AI revenue is key to Intel's growth. Slower growth may signal issues.
Confirms:AI-driven business revenue grows less than 30% year over year in Q2 2026.
Disproves:AI-driven business revenue grows more than 40% year over year in Q2 2026.
Why it matters: Successful product launches help regain market share. They also drive more revenue.
Confirms:Launch of Panther Lake and additional SKUs occurs on schedule by year-end.
Disproves:Delays in Panther Lake or other key product launches push back timelines.
Advances: Expand AI-driven businesses
Cornelis winning supercomputer role expands AI-driven business.
Advances: Ramp Intel 18A production
Details on process milestones support ramping 18A production.
Advances: Expand AI-driven businesses
Deployment of supercomputer supports AI-driven business expansion.
Advances: Ramp Intel 18A production
Cornelis using Intel chips boosts AI-driven business.
Advances: Expand AI-driven businesses
Significant investment boosts AI-driven business growth potential.
Advances: Expand AI-driven businesses
Strengthens Intel's position in AI partnerships and market presence.
Advances: Ramp Intel 18A production
Large order from Google boosts production outlook.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On April 23, 2026, Intel Corporation (“Intel” or the "Company") issued a press release announcing the financial results of its first quarter ended March 28, 2026 and forward-looking statements relating to its second quarter of 2026. A copy of this press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein. The attached press release includes non-GAAP financial measures relating to our operations and forecasted outloo…
Other Events. On April 30, 2026, Intel Corporation (“Intel”) issued $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.650% Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes”), $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.000% Senior Notes due 2033 (the “2033 Notes”), $2,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2036 Notes”), $1,750,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2056 (the “2056 Notes”) and $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.200%…
Other Events On April 8, 2026, Intel Corporation (“Intel”) repurchased from Apollo-managed funds and affiliates their 49% equity interest in the parties’ joint venture related to Intel’s Fab 34 in Ireland. The $14.2 billion repurchase price was financed by Intel with cash on hand and a bridge loan of $6.5 billion, which Intel intends to refinance, subject to market conditions. Intel owns 100% of the joint venture following the repurchase. The joint venture was created and operated pursuant to…
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On March 30,2026, Intel Corporation determined that April Miller Boise, Intel’s Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, will separate from Intel effective as of June 1, 2026. Upon her departure on June 1, 2026, Ms. Miller Boise will be entitled to severance benefits in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Intel Corporation Exec…