Reading JCAP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JCAP free→Reading JCAP? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track JCAP free→NASDAQFinancialsCredit ServicesSnapshot 2026-07-06
Recent financial performance sits below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
The thesis is that JCAP's steady performance can drive growth in the financial sector. Revenue growth is expected to improve as sector bellwethers continue to perform well. JCAP trades at 2.4× price-to-book, which is above the peer median of 2.0×. This suggests the price reflects less growth than anticipated. A specific risk is that if JCAP cuts guidance, the stock may decline. Peer multiples imply a price about 33% above where it trades; this read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 10 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $18.55. As of 2026-07-06. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $19 JCAP trades at 2.4× p/b, in line with its 2.0× p/b peer median — but our blended $30 fair value sits well above the price. It's a high-confidence read. Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 35% below a flat-multiple fair value, while analysts forecast about 7% growth — below our forecast. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal yet.
Most sensitive to the broad stock market.
Not enough signal to read sensitivity to the US dollar, real (inflation-adjusted) rates, long-term interest rates, Fed net liquidity.
7 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=3598).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $0.71 → $0.71 (-0.3% / 30d). 1 raised, 2 cut, 4 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 100% of analysts rate Buy.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
Met or beat guidance 0% of the last 2 guided quarters · -4.6% avg surprise
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
On a typical day, $10k can swing ±$130.
How much price usually moves either way.
On a bad day, this stock has moved -$343.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $3,183.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Our read on the company is unchanged since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-07-06
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: Meeting the EPS guidance shows the company is on track for growth. It confirms management's outlook.
Confirms:Q2 2026 EPS reported at $0.61 or higher.
Disproves:Q2 2026 EPS reported below $0.61.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Strong earnings support EPS guidance for 2026.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
of this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly provided by specific reference in such a filing.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Looks cheaper than most peers in the same business.
Around its own typical valuation.
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Consumer Finance.
| Stock | Sector standing | Risk |
|---|---|---|
JCAP Jefferson Capital, Inc. | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 91 of 100 | moderate |
AXP American Express | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 63 of 100 | moderate |
COF Capital One | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 36 of 100 | moderate |
AFRM Affirm Holdings Inc | Below typical Show detailsSector percentile: 6 of 100 | high |
SYF Synchrony Financial | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 83 of 100 | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-07-06.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-07-06.
Management has set an EPS guidance of $0.61 for the second quarter of 2026.
Newly stated in 2026-Q1. Management has set an EPS guidance of $0.61 for Q2 2026. The financials show a net income of $37.6 million and an EPS of $0.61 for Q1 2026, indicating alignment with the guidance. The trajectory is consistent with the stated guidance.
“Pre-tax Income of $51.1 Million with Net Income of $37.6 Million and EPS of $0.61.”
Management has set an annual EPS guidance of $5.64 for the fiscal year 2026.
Newly stated in 2025-Q4. Management has set an annual EPS guidance of $5.64 for 2026. The financials for Q1 2026 show an EPS of $0.61, which is consistent with the quarterly trajectory needed to meet the annual guidance. The trajectory is aligned with the stated guidance.
“Net income attributable to Jefferson Capital, Inc. ... $5.64.”
Management has maintained a consistent dividend per share of $0.24.
Stated in 2 of last 2 quarters. The dividend per share has remained consistent at $0.24 from 2025-Q3 to 2026-Q1. This stability in dividend payout reflects management's commitment to capital allocation priorities. The trajectory is delivering as stated.
“Dividend per share remains at $0.24.”
“Dividend per share remains at $0.24.”
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth signals a weakening trend in the financial sector. It could affect investor confidence.
Confirms:Revenue growth reported below the median for the sector.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains above the median for the sector.
Why it matters: The dividend of $0.24 shows financial stability. It shows a commitment to shareholders and how money is spent.
Confirms:Dividend per share reported at $0.24.
Disproves:Dividend per share reported below $0.24.
Why it matters: FOMC decisions change interest rates. They also change how much money is in the market. These changes impact the financial sector.
Confirms one read:FOMC raises interest rates. This shows a stronger economy.
Confirms the other:FOMC keeps interest rates the same or lowers them. This shows economic concerns.
Why it matters: Retail sales data can indicate consumer spending trends. This affects the financial sector's outlook.
Confirms one read:Retail sales go up each month. This shows strong consumer spending.
Confirms the other:Retail sales go down each month. This shows weak consumer spending.
Why it matters: Keeping the annual EPS guidance shows strong performance. It also shows investor confidence and growth potential.
Confirms:Annual EPS reported at $5.64 or higher.
Disproves:Annual EPS reported below $5.64.
Earnings call provides insights on future performance.
Beating EPS forecast indicates strong operational performance.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On April 22, 2026 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), CL Holdings, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“CL Holdings”), Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“JCap”), JC International Acquisition, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“JCIA”), CFG Canada Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CFG” and, together with CL Holdings, JCap and JCIA, the “Borrowers”), and certain subsidiaries of the Borrow…
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant The information set forth under
of this Current Report on Form 8-K (including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly provided by specific reference in such a filing.
Director — Christopher Giles: Mr. Giles resigned to focus on his other professional commitments and as part of the Board's evolution.