Reading GEMI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GEMI free→Reading GEMI? Track it free: the weekly brief, plus an alert if the thesis breaks. No credit card.
Track GEMI free→
NASDAQFinancialsCapital MarketsSnapshot 2026-07-06
Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort — worth keeping an eye on, though it has not freshly broken.
The thesis is that GEMI's growth potential is strong, driven by its market position. Revenue growth is expected to improve, despite recent weak performance. The stock trades at a multiple that suggests it is undervalued compared to peers. However, if GEMI cuts guidance on the next call, it could face challenges. Peer multiples imply a price about 25% above where it trades; this read is provisional.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
A consensus fair price across 3 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $4.41. As of 2026-07-06. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
We can't anchor a clean multiple for GEMI right now, so treat our $6.34 fair value as low-confidence (our number sits above the analyst range). Analysts target $5.00–$6.00. Note: our $6.34 fair value sits above the entire analyst range ($5.00–$6.00). Not investment advice.
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
The price sits about 33% below a flat-multiple fair value, while analysts forecast about 26% growth — below our forecast. This describes what's priced in, not a forecast of the move.
TTM earnings are negative, so the read leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods rather than P/E. This is a data condition, not a forward call.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Each factor is a parallel diagnostic with a clear read of what it shows and how names like it have historically fared. Never aggregated into a single score.
Operating income rose in 2 of the last 3 quarter-over-quarter moves. Historically, Financials names rated weak grew net income 55% of the time over the next year (vs 58% for the rest of the cohort, n=7357).
Not enough signal yet.
Not enough signal yet.
5 material management or governance events in the past 24 months, led by capital-allocation actions. Historically, Financials names rated neutral grew net income 49% of the time over the next year (vs 51% for the rest of the cohort, n=3598).
The next print and the backdrop around it (sector regime and the AI cycle). Context for the path, not a forecast of returns.
EPS estimate $-0.55 → $-0.60 (-10.0% / 30d). 2 raised, 0 cut, 4 covering analysts.
0 upgrades, 0 downgrades / 30d. 33% of analysts rate Buy.
via XLF
Tailwind = sector leading the S&P 500; headwind = trailing. Both can be constructive. Historically, headwind regimes have averaged stronger forward returns than tailwind.
How management runs the business: capital, margins, balance sheet, and how reliably they guide and deliver.
A guidance track record builds as the company issues and delivers on guidance.
Priorities management has stated in recent disclosures, with status and evidence drawn from earnings calls, filings, and press releases.
What a normal day, a bad day, and the worst of the last year would mean for a $10,000 position.
Not enough price history for this read.
How much price usually moves either way.
Not enough price history for this read.
A rough but not unusual down day (about the 95th percentile).
In the worst 12 months, $10k could have lost $2,378.
Deepest peak-to-trough drop in the last year.
Past results, not a forecast. Not investment advice.
The most important moves since the prior daily snapshot.
Our read on the company is unchanged since the prior snapshot.
as of 2026-07-06
Specific, dated things to watch for, each with what would confirm it and what would prove it wrong.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth could signal a slowdown in the business environment.
Confirms:Gemini's revenue growth falls below 10% year over year.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains above 10% year over year.
Recent news graded against this company's own objectives — whether it reinforces or challenges the thesis, and how confirmed it is.
Class action may impact investor confidence.
Conditional scenarios: if X happens, the view would shift in this direction. These are not predictions.
Recent SEC 8-K filings ranked by likely impact, confidence, and recency.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On May 14, 2026, Gemini issued a press release (the “Q1 2026 Earnings Release”) announcing its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. A copy of the Q1 2026 Earnings Release is furnished as Exhibit 99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Whether the overall read has been drifting up or down lately, and how it's changed since last week.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.
$5.00 – $6.00 (median $5.00) · 3 analysts · as of 2026-04-21
Roughly priced in line with peers.
Self-history needs ~20 months of data.
Trailing four: 2024-Q3, 2025-Q1, 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1
A side-by-side read on sector standing, valuation, and risk versus Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Stock | Sector standing | Risk |
|---|---|---|
GEMI Gemini Space Station Inc | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 78 of 100 | moderate |
MS Morgan Stanley | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 79 of 100 | moderate |
GS Goldman Sachs | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 77 of 100 | moderate |
SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | Above typical Show detailsSector percentile: 86 of 100 | moderate |
IBKR Interactive Brokers | Typical Show detailsSector percentile: 42 of 100 | moderate |
Not investment advice. As of 2026-07-06.
Context label only: describes the market state (e.g. real bear vs narrative panic, healthy uptrend vs late-stage froth). It is not a per-ticker buy/sell signal and does not predict factor performance.
Not investment advice. As of 2026-07-06.
Implement a plan to exit and wind down operations in Europe and Australia to reduce operating expenses.
Entered into a securities purchase agreement to issue shares to Winklevoss Capital Fund.
Continue business operations in the United States and Singapore after exiting other regions.
Why it matters: FOMC decisions can change interest rates. This can affect Gemini's business and market conditions.
Confirms one read:FOMC raises interest rates or hints at future increases.
Confirms the other:FOMC keeps interest rates steady or lowers them.
Why it matters: A drop in revenue growth signals a slowdown in the financial sector. This could impact Gemini's performance.
Confirms:Revenue growth falls below its median of around 15%.
Disproves:Revenue growth remains at or above the median of 15%.
Why it matters: Rising unemployment claims may show economic weakness. This could change Gemini's market outlook.
Confirms:Weekly unemployment claims rise a lot compared to the previous week.
Disproves:Weekly unemployment claims stay stable or decline.
Why it matters: Lower operating costs can help Gemini make more money and improve cash flow.
Confirms:Operating expenses decrease by more than 10% in the next quarter.
Disproves:Operating expenses increase or stay the same in the next quarter.
Why it matters: A successful placement can give the money needed for growth and stability.
Confirms:Look for news about finishing the private placement in the next quarter.
Disproves:Watch for signs of not finishing the private placement or big delays.
Price target cut indicates valuation concerns.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On May 14, 2026, Gemini Space Station, Inc. (“Gemini,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with Winklevoss Capital Fund, LLC (the “Purchaser”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Purchaser, in a private placement, 7,142,857 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Shares”), at a price of $14.00 per share, for a…
Based in part upon the representations of the Purchaser in the Securities Purchase Agreement, the offering and sale of the Shares was exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The sale of the Shares by the Company in the Private Placement was not registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws and the Shares may not be offered or sold absent registration with the SEC or an applicable exemption from the reg…
Results of Operations and Financial Condition On March 19, 2026, Gemini Space Station, Inc. (“Gemini,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”) issued a shareholder letter (the “Shareholder Letter”) and supplemental materials (the “2025 Earnings Presentation”) announcing its financial results for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2025. Copies of the Shareholder Letter and 2025 Earnings Presentation are furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and Exhibit 99.2, respectively, to this Current Report on Form…
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Director — Marshall Beard, Dan Chen, Tyler Meade: The company is parting ways with the COO, CFO, and Chief Legal Officer, which represents a significant loss of senior leadership.